RESUMO
The World Health Organization (WHO) was born as a normative agency and has looked to global health law to structure collective action to realize global health with justice. Framed by its constitutional authority to act as the directing and coordinating authority on international health, WHO has long been seen as the central actor in the development and implementation of global health law. However, WHO has faced challenges in advancing law to prevent disease and promote health over the past 75 years, with global health law constrained by new health actors, shifting normative frameworks, and soft law diplomacy. These challenges were exacerbated amid the COVID-19 pandemic, as states neglected international legal commitments in national health responses. Yet, global health law reforms are now underway to strengthen WHO governance, signaling a return to lawmaking for global health. Looking back on WHO's 75th anniversary, this article examines the central importance of global health law under WHO governance, reviewing the past successes, missed opportunities, and future hopes for WHO. For WHO to meet its constitutional authority to become the normative agency it was born to be, we offer five proposals to reestablish a WHO fit for purpose: normative instruments, equity and human rights mainstreaming, sustainable financing, One Health, and good governance. Drawing from past struggles, these reforms will require further efforts to revitalize hard law authorities in global health, strengthen WHO leadership across the global governance landscape, uphold equity and rights at the center of global health law, and expand negotiations in global health diplomacy.
RESUMO
The right to health has been cast in increasingly broad terms in international human rights law, not only as a right to health care but also as a right to an ever more broad range of underlying and social determinants of health. Utilizing an analytical framework grounded in this broad view of the right to health, this article presents the findings of an empirical review of the right to health in the recommendations issued to states during the first two cycles of the Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review. The Universal Periodic Review, a peer-review mechanism, has come to occupy a prominent position in global human rights oversight, not least because all United Nations member states are regularly scrutinized under the procedure. It has also been identified as a potentially valuable mechanism to enhance accountability around the Sustainable Development Goals. The article highlights that the right to health is prominent in the Universal Periodic Review's recommendations, a conclusion that contrasts with existing perceptions that the right has been given limited attention by the procedure. However, the article argues that the quality of these recommendations is uneven. Increasing the engagement of key health stakeholders in the procedure will be important to enhance its potential for the right to health.
Assuntos
Objetivos , Revisão por Pares , Direito à Saúde , Responsabilidade Social , Saúde Global , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Determinantes Sociais da Saúde , Participação dos Interessados , Nações UnidasRESUMO
The Universal Periodic Review is a comprehensive, state-to-state peer-review mechanism of the United Nations (UN) Human Rights Council. Created in 2006, the mechanism scrutinizes the human rights record of all UN Member States, including their efforts to realize the right to health. However, the mechanism is relatively under-used in global health governance compared to treaty-based procedures, such as those overseen by the Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities or the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women. We suggest that the Universal Periodic Review could be used to support the monitoring and review processes of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). The review could offer a unique perspective for other actors on how to ensure accountability for the complex and intertwined SDGs, including their commitments for health. This article provides an overview of how health-related rights have been addressed in the Universal Periodic Review process and how the review can contribute to advancing global commitments to health, including those embodied in the SDGs. We present some of the current limitations in the way health is addressed in the Universal Periodic Review. We also consider what role specialized UN agencies, such as the World Health Organization, might play during the Universal Periodic Review process and how this involvement can contribute towards the comprehensive realization of health and wellbeing for all.
L'Examen périodique universel est un mécanisme complet d'évaluation entre États du Conseil des droits de l'homme des Nations Unies (ONU). Créé en 2006, ce mécanisme passe en revue les réalisations de l'ensemble des États membres de l'ONU dans le domaine des droits de l'homme, et notamment leurs efforts en faveur de l'application du droit à la santé. Ce mécanisme est néanmoins relativement sous-utilisé dans la gouvernance de la santé mondiale par rapport aux procédures fondées sur des traités comme celles supervisées par le Comité des droits des personnes handicapées ou le Comité pour l'élimination de la discrimination à l'égard des femmes. Nous suggérons d'utiliser l'Examen périodique universel pour soutenir les processus de suivi et d'examen des objectifs de développement durable (ODD). L'examen pourrait offrir une perspective unique à d'autres acteurs sur la façon de garantir le principe de responsabilité pour les ODD, complexes et interdépendants, et notamment leurs engagements en matière de santé. Cet article fournit un aperçu de la façon dont les droits liés à la santé sont traités dans le cadre de l'Examen périodique universel et de la façon dont l'examen peut contribuer à faire avancer les engagements mondiaux en faveur de la santé, et notamment ceux inclus dans les ODD. Nous présentons quelques-unes des limites actuelles de l'Examen périodique universel concernant la façon dont il traite de la santé. Nous avons également étudié le rôle que peuvent jouer certaines institutions spécialisées des Nations Unies, telles que l'Organisation mondiale de la Santé, dans le cadre de l'Examen périodique universel, et en quoi ce rôle peut contribuer à l'atteinte de l'objectif de la santé et du bien-être pour tous.
La Revisión periódica universal es un mecanismo integral de revisión entre pares de estado a estado del Consejo de Derechos Humanos de las Naciones Unidas (ONU). Creado en 2006, el mecanismo examina el historial relativo a los derechos humanos de todos los Estados Miembros de las Naciones Unidas, incluidos sus esfuerzos por cumplir el derecho a la salud. Sin embargo, el mecanismo está relativamente infrautilizado en la gobernanza de la salud mundial en comparación con los procedimientos basados en tratados, como los supervisados por el Comité sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad o el Comité para la Eliminación de la Discriminación contra la Mujer. Se sugiere que la Revisión periódica universal se utilice para apoyar los procesos de seguimiento y revisión de los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible (ODS). La revisión podría ofrecer una perspectiva única para otros participantes sobre cómo asegurar la responsabilidad de los complejos y vinculados ODS, incluyendo sus compromisos con la salud. Este artículo ofrece una visión general de cómo se han abordado los derechos relacionados con la salud en el proceso de la Revisión periódica universal y cómo la misma puede contribuir al avance de los compromisos mundiales con la salud, incluidos los incorporados en los ODS. Se presentan algunas de las limitaciones actuales en la forma en que se aborda la salud en la Revisión periódica universal. También se valora qué papel podrían desempeñar los organismos especializados de las Naciones Unidas, como la Organización Mundial de la Salud, durante el proceso de la Revisión periódica universal y cómo esta participación puede contribuir a la realización integral de la salud y el bienestar para todos.
